Esther 6 · a question people ask
Why hadn't Mordecai been rewarded already?
The book doesn't say. When Mordecai's report was looked into, "it was found to be so", and "it was written in the book of the chronicles in the king’s presence" (Esther 2:23). There chapter 2 ends. Chapter 3 begins, "After these things King Ahasuerus promoted Haman the son of Hammedatha the Agagite" (Esther 3:1). The book sets the two side by side and gives no reason for either. When the record is read, the king asks, "What honor and dignity has been given to Mordecai for this?" (6:3), and his servants answer plainly: "Nothing has been done for him" (6:3). The chapter doesn't say what the king thought when he heard it, and these notes don't guess.
The verses
“When this matter was investigated, and it was found to be so, they were both hanged on a gallows; and it was written in the book of the chronicles in the king’s presence.”
“After these things King Ahasuerus promoted Haman the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, and advanced him, and set his seat above all the princes who were with him.”
“The king said, “What honor and dignity has been given to Mordecai for this?” Then the king’s servants who attended him said, “Nothing has been done for him.””